From: David Lynch
<dnl1960 at yahoo.com>

To: Anil K. Seth <a.k.seth at sussex.ac.uk>; Sean Carroll <seancarroll at gmail.com>

Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021, 06:49:54 AM EDT

Subject: Nominal Emergence~Consciousness

Anil,

"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the Evaporation of Control." ~3K

In the podcast,

Mindscape 168 | Anil Seth on Emergence, Information, and Consciousness

Sean Carroll speaks of having arguments with people that like to let a richer ontology into their Universe.

In the example of atoms emerging into a chair or table, Sean says that he has equations that fully described the process.

Please Sean do share the equation that fully describes the process of a chair emerging. Not an equation for a chair that emerges from granite or a chair that emerges from gold.

Provide an equation that fully describes the emergence of an oak wood chair, with green velvet upholstery, with horse hair seat padding, and with hunting scenes carved into the wood back.

Simply, science cannot provide such an equation without a richer ontology than the standard model of particle physics. Case in point, Science cannot fully describe the reproduction of a horse from sperm and egg cells. For equations to fully describe the above chair requires a life force augmentation to your standard particle model.

The wooden chair requires a life force to be introduced into your standard model. The life within the tree, the life within the sheep, the life within the horse, and the life within the craftsman. The life force would sit beside the Higgs boson that gives rise to mass. The life force would give rise to manipulation of matter.

When Science does not know, a guess is postulated such as a Starling murmuration is a group act to ward of predators or to keep warm. Maybe the flock is a bunch of individuals that just happen to be doing the same thing at the same time. Could be the Starlings are all individually chasing a magnetic fluctuation that gives the appearance of unified flight.

Sean has forgotten the teaching of Socrates. The instant that we think we know, is the moment that we stop learning.

Until Science accepts that the standard particle model must be augmented by adding a life force, consciousness will never be fully described.

The language of mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, had lead scientists astray. To resolve the mathematical language barrier, Science needs a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”. The number line with an infinite number of infinites has trapped great minds in wormholes made of mirrors, and has Science stuck in black holes filled with rabbits.

Over the years, I have reached out to those that might listen, and I have sent out numerous emails that explains an equation that uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the saying of Socrates to describe a moment of time as infinite. I call the equation the KnoWell.

The equation emerged from two terabytes of abstract artwork.

Letters Sent to Those That Might Listen

In my Dowker email, I explain how to use String's M theory to describe a steady state universe via a brane of absolute Control and a brane of pure Chaos exchanging place at the infinitesimal of a moment.

In my most recent email, I reached out to a philosopher.

In the Bjørn Ekeberg email, I show that the KnoWell expresses each of the following.

Anaximander's~Apeiron,

Schrodinger's~Three State Cat,

Einstein's~E=mc^2,

Descartes~I think therfore I am,

Newton's~Action equals reaction,

Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis,

Lynch's~Birth Life Death

Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing

String's~11 dimension M Theory

Standard Particle Theory~ Bosons, Leptons, Quarks

Supersymmetry~ AntiBosons, AntiLeptons, AntiQuarks

Bosonic String's~ 27 dimensions

A singular KnoWell structure contains a past up, down, both, a moment, up, down, both, and a future up, down, both, providing 9 states.

Combining a past KnoWell, a moment KnoWell, and a future KnoWell produces 27 states.,

To: Anil K. Seth <a.k.seth at sussex.ac.uk>; Sean Carroll <seancarroll at gmail.com>

Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021, 06:49:54 AM EDT

Subject: Nominal Emergence~Consciousness

Anil,

"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the Evaporation of Control." ~3K

In the podcast,

Mindscape 168 | Anil Seth on Emergence, Information, and Consciousness

Sean Carroll speaks of having arguments with people that like to let a richer ontology into their Universe.

In the example of atoms emerging into a chair or table, Sean says that he has equations that fully described the process.

Please Sean do share the equation that fully describes the process of a chair emerging. Not an equation for a chair that emerges from granite or a chair that emerges from gold.

Provide an equation that fully describes the emergence of an oak wood chair, with green velvet upholstery, with horse hair seat padding, and with hunting scenes carved into the wood back.

Simply, science cannot provide such an equation without a richer ontology than the standard model of particle physics. Case in point, Science cannot fully describe the reproduction of a horse from sperm and egg cells. For equations to fully describe the above chair requires a life force augmentation to your standard particle model.

The wooden chair requires a life force to be introduced into your standard model. The life within the tree, the life within the sheep, the life within the horse, and the life within the craftsman. The life force would sit beside the Higgs boson that gives rise to mass. The life force would give rise to manipulation of matter.

When Science does not know, a guess is postulated such as a Starling murmuration is a group act to ward of predators or to keep warm. Maybe the flock is a bunch of individuals that just happen to be doing the same thing at the same time. Could be the Starlings are all individually chasing a magnetic fluctuation that gives the appearance of unified flight.

Sean has forgotten the teaching of Socrates. The instant that we think we know, is the moment that we stop learning.

Until Science accepts that the standard particle model must be augmented by adding a life force, consciousness will never be fully described.

The language of mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, had lead scientists astray. To resolve the mathematical language barrier, Science needs a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”. The number line with an infinite number of infinites has trapped great minds in wormholes made of mirrors, and has Science stuck in black holes filled with rabbits.

Over the years, I have reached out to those that might listen, and I have sent out numerous emails that explains an equation that uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the saying of Socrates to describe a moment of time as infinite. I call the equation the KnoWell.

The equation emerged from two terabytes of abstract artwork.

Letters Sent to Those That Might Listen

In my Dowker email, I explain how to use String's M theory to describe a steady state universe via a brane of absolute Control and a brane of pure Chaos exchanging place at the infinitesimal of a moment.

In my most recent email, I reached out to a philosopher.

In the Bjørn Ekeberg email, I show that the KnoWell expresses each of the following.

Anaximander's~Apeiron,

Schrodinger's~Three State Cat,

Einstein's~E=mc^2,

Descartes~I think therfore I am,

Newton's~Action equals reaction,

Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis,

Lynch's~Birth Life Death

Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing

String's~11 dimension M Theory

Standard Particle Theory~ Bosons, Leptons, Quarks

Supersymmetry~ AntiBosons, AntiLeptons, AntiQuarks

Bosonic String's~ 27 dimensions

A singular KnoWell structure contains a past up, down, both, a moment, up, down, both, and a future up, down, both, providing 9 states.

Combining a past KnoWell, a moment KnoWell, and a future KnoWell produces 27 states.,

The KnoWellian Cosmos shows the Big Bang in a new light. Control~Particles on the left and Chaos~Waves on the right.

Modern science has been mislead by the language of mathematics, modern science is blinded by the Big Bang theory, and modern science is deaf without a richer ontology.

A potential resolution is for the language of mathematics to replace the number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, with a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”

Science's greatest mistake is 0.0

Life is the force from which consciousness nominally emerges.

Your thoughts are most welcome,

David Noel Lynch

.