From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Katie Robertson <k.e.robertson at bham.ac.uk>
Cc: David Sloan <d.sloan at lancaster.ac.uk>; Julian
Barbour <julian.barbour at physics.ox.ac.uk>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020, 2:46:01 AM EST
Subject: Alternative to the Twin Universe Janus Point
In the BBC Reel video, you give an interpretation of
David Sloan's Parameter Time.
Clearly you have an understanding of the Twin
Universe theory and the Janus Point as postulated by
Julian and David.
People say that a dog is man's best friend. That is until
you try to take a steak bone away from a hungry dog.
A mathematician is your best friend, until to try to take
0.0 away from them.
An astronomer is your best friend, until to try to take
the Big Bang theory away from them.
A quantum theorist is your best friend, until you try to
take Many Worlds theory way from them.
On the flip side, a Christian is your best friend, until
you try to take Jesus away from them.
At 33 seconds in the above linked video
, Julian says,
"We have to think out of the box and readjust our thinking to what is
really happening in the Universe."
The language of Mathematics has placed the theories of modern
astronomy into a big bang box.
When I fell out of the box, was at the moment that I
realized that since the universe is made of atoms, "no thing" could be
As a scientists, I realized that using 0.0 to describe the
universe was my greatest mistake.
In the early 2000s, I stumbled across Julian Barbour's "The
End of Time" book.
At the time, I was searching for out of the box ways to
look at the world around me.
I found his writing most intriguing. Until I read how he was sure
that in an alternate universe Lady Dianna was still alive.
can be triggered by certain words, we all have
mental land mines that explode causing deafness and
Julian triggered the Many Worlds blindness in me, and
understandably this email could trigger similar blindness in Julian's
Trigger land mine. The Many Worlds theory like the
Multiverse theory is a mathematical mistake.
Below is a link to a graphic that explains how
Science could be lead to BLeave in multiple separate universes.
The language of mathematics more specifically the number
line - ∞<0.0< ∞+,
has lead science astray.
When Julian states that what is needed is to think outside
of the box.
One must first define the box that contains them.
My contention is that mathematics describes the box, and what is
needed is a new axiom of mathematics.
The axiom that resolves many mathematical mistakes is the
new axiom, “ -c>∞<c+ ”
Read: negative speed of light is greater than infinity,
and infinity is less than speed of light positive.
At 33 seconds in the above linked video,
as Julian states we need to readjust our thinking, and the graphic
is a reflection that looks like a
Using the new axiom of mathematics, “
-c>∞<c+ ”, I present to you another
butterfly that I call the KnoWell.
A philosopher's LENS that uses the
logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein,
the force of Newton, and the sayings of Socrates to describe a
moment of time as infinite.
In my below linked email to Fay Dowker, I describe how to
apply the KnoWell to modern cosmological questions.
"The emergence of the Universe is the
precipitation of Chaos through the evaporation of Control." ~3K
In the Twin Universe video, there is a time line before
the big bang,
a time line after the big bang that are both heading away from the
and a parameter time line intersecting the totality of both time
The KnoWell has a control time line, in a "particle"
that is expanding and is interchanging energy with a
chaos time line, in a "wave" state, that is collapsing.
This interaction is creating the infinite
of a moment.
The friction of control "particle" exchanging
place with chaos "wave"
and vice versa creates what is seen as the 3K background
The graphic representation of the KnoWell in relation to
the Twin Universe graphic,
is the same butterfly wing on the left, but a chaotic cloud like wing
on the right.
The father away from the moment, the more chaotic and diffused
the right wing would become.
The arrow of time is the evaporation of control and the
precipitation of chaos onto the wick of the moment.
What ->was, "all of history", is combined with what
->could be, "all potential futures", to create ->what is, "the
The instant that a ->what was, is combined with a ->what
the sum total of ->what could be, is reduced by one and the
->what was is increased by one.
The arrow of time is that everything can only happen
Below is a link to the artwork that I used to derive the
If you click on the smaller images in the above "kant
" link you will expand the images.
Your thoughts are most welcome,
David Noel Lynch