From:
David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Bob Harbort <bharbort at earnshaw.us>; Fred Partus <fpartus
at yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 at 01:59:52 PM EDT
Subject: Entanglement
Gentlemen,
In the below article,
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-universe-is-not-locally-real-and-the-physics-nobel-prize-winners-proved-it/
***
As Albert Einstein once bemoaned to a friend, “Do you really believe the
moon is not there when you are not looking at it?”
"Quantum mechanics dictates that it is impossible to know the spin, a
quantum property of individual particles, prior to measurement. Once Alice
measures one of her particles, she finds its spin to be either “up” or
“down.” Her results are random, and yet when she measures up, she
instantly knows that Bob's corresponding particle— which had a random,
indefinite spin—must now be down."
***
Science has a funny way of redefining the meaning of words.
The Universe emerged from nothing, but the universe did not emerge from
the nothing that most people BLeave nothing means.
Since Science contends by measuring one spin state that the second spin
state is automatically known without measurement, that means quantum
theory is incorrect claiming to dictate the impossibility to know without
measurement.
Holding true to the impossibility dictated by quantum mechanics that
requires a measurement to be made before the state is known, the
assumption that a measurement of one particle's state is known without
measurement on the second particle means that the impossibility clause is
fractured.
Now that the impossibility clause has been invalidated, quantum theory has
taken a quantum leap into pseudoscience emerging from the infinite number
of infinities on the number line.
I am with Einstein, the Moon will be there long after my observations of
the Moon are gone.
Sadly we live in an age when if the mathematics adds up, the theory must
be true.
We are doomed as a society.
Case in point:
Science entangles two particles.
The first particle sent into a fiber optic cable long enough to
encapsulate the particle while the second particle is sent out to a
detector.
The first particle
is measured.
Unannounced to the scientists, one infinitesimal instant after the first
particle was measured the second particle was absorbed by my hand that I
placed in its path.
Through equations Science will proclaim to know the spin state of the
second particle even though the particle has been destroyed.
In reality the scientists will not know that the second particle has been
destroyed until another measurement is attempted on either particle.
Idiots.
Regards,
David