From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at>
To: "ccorbally at" <ccorbally at>
Cc: "benedictxvi at" <benedictxvi at>;
"archbishop at" <archbishop at>;
"contactus at" <contactus at>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009, 05:01:48 AM EDT

Please pardon my interruption into your busy day.
In your research highlights regarding the acceleration of the universe you state, "Much to the surprise of the search team, the distances to the supernovae have been greater than those predicted by the Big Bang."  Enter "dark energy"
In your research highlights regarding MACHOs you state, "These "microlensing" events reveal otherwise invisible MACHOs, thought to be part of the 90% of a galaxy's mass that does not shine, but exerts a gravitational force on the stars of the galaxy, making it rotate faster than can be accounted for by the glowing matter: "  Enter "dark matter"
When the symmetry of the 3K back ground radiation could not be explained, the theory of inflation was introduced. When the red shift of supernocae did not match the Big Bang prediction, the theory of dark energy was introduced. When the microlensing of star light was found to be greater then the mass of the refraction object, the theory of dark matter was introduced.
All this leave me with one question. Why does the star light of a distant star follow the curve of gravitationally warped time space around a nearby star?
A Big Banger might answer. The star light's path is altered by the pull of gravity.
The baggage of the Big Bang has grown quite large, and will continue to grow. Because Scientists no longer look for reasons outside the construct of the Big Bang, Science has forgotten its mission statement. Science has become blind. Thinking only inside the Big Bang Box.
Ponder for a moment that an alternate theory is put forth regarding the reason that star light is seemingly bent by massive objects. That this theory could explain the various observed red shifting of distant star light. That this theory is expressed on the name of God... I A M
To state the imposable: "To crack the shell of Science, one must crush the mustard seed of Religion."   3K
In the spirit of Hagel, using the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the logic of Socrates, I have created an equation for a moment of time. I call this equation the KnoWell.  Below is a link to a video of me drawing a KnoWell.
Below is a letter that I received in response to my position on naked singularities. Below the response is my original letter that states my position that gravity is the result of the collapse of outer space. Gravity is a push, not a pull. Using this model the star light that is bent around massive objects is due to the wave energy that is collapsing from outer space towards inner space. That this wave energy is also stretching light causing the red shift of star light.
The KnoWell strongly suggests that we are living in a Hoyle's steady state universe. The missing mass of the micro-lensing effect can be explained by looking at a fog that is about to condensate into rain drops. The distant wave energy of outer space is chaotic with little structure. As the wave energy is pressed in towards massive objects, the chaos begins to gain symmetry then presses star light towards the massive object. This collapse seemingly bends the light by pushing the passing waves in towards the massive object. 
To understand the KnoWell position, one must think in reverse. A black hole is not needed to hold the universe together. A black hole is more like a seed from which everything is rushing outward. "A leak." Dark energy is the release of inner space trying to reach outer space. Please see my explanation below...
The attached file, Gold.jpg, is how I worked out my equation. You should show Gold.jpg and the KnoWell to the pope.
Best wishes,
David Noel Lynch

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: psj <psj at>
To: David Lynch <dnl1960 at>
Cc: Scientific American <editors at>; Fred Partus <fpartus at>; Neil deGrasse Tyson <tyson at>
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2009 10:42:49 PM
Subject: Re: A Naked Singularity

Dear Dr David Lynch,

Thank you for your mail and the interest.

The gravitational collapse is an intriguing phenomena, especially when
viewed from the perspective of the gravitation theory. While in Newtonian gravity,
it is the density or mass that plays the major role in determining the gravitational
interaction, in Einstein gravity the spacetime curvatures play a major role. The
event horizons may or may not form necessarily as the mass densities grow
during the progress of collapse. Many intriguing features than result as we discuss
in the article.
The connections and implications for the possible quantum gravity formulations
are most puzzling and exciting. That is a road very much under travel, and thank you
for your interesting comments and the possibilities you indicated. The connections
to condensed matter systems and statistical physics are certainly not ruled out.

With best regards,

Pankaj S. Joshi

David Lynch wrote:
Please pardon my interruption into your busy day. 
Your article in Scientific American regarding naked singularities opens many doors to a new way to look at the concept of a black hole.
In making one of your points, you mention that Einstein's equations for gravity suggests that there is a component that produces a reverse force to the direction of gravity. You called that effect a sheering.
Using Newton's third law. Postulate for a moment that the sheering is the action, and that gravity is the reaction. The sheering action could be caused by quantum loops of gravity that are extruding outward from inner space, and the reaction could be due to super strings of symmetry that are collapsing inward from outer space. Thus particles are in a state of expansion / emission while waves are in a state of contraction / absorption.
Under this concept, outer space would appear to be cooling while inner space would appear to be warming. In this mind set, we are in a Hoyle's steady state universe. With gravity as a push due to the collapse of outer space, the light coming from distant stars would be stretched over distance. Thus causing the appearance of the red shifting of star light. The red shift would be an indicator of distance not the speed of retreat.
This perplexing concept could explain why most all stars seems to be moving away from us as if a big bang occurred., and would explain the symmetry in the distribution of the background radiation. Think in terms of Lorentz's ether filling outer space, and there is no need for inflation to explain away the observed symmetrical anomaly in the background radiation.
To better express my position, I have created an equation. In the spirit of Hagel, using the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the logic of Socrates, below is a link to a video of me drawing what I call a KnoWell. The KnoWell defines a moment of time as the infinite one.
The KnoWell equation opens the door for time travel to use quantum tunnels opened by oscillating super strings of symmetry upon quantum loops of gravity.. No longer does one need infinite amounts of energy to transgress time.
Mathematics is a beautiful language with one glaring mistake. "0.0" Think about it, one "1" trying to define nothing is truly NSane. Since we all live in a constant change of state, I vote that science gives zero, 0.0, the boot. Remove zero from all equations.  The icing on the KnoWell cake would be to replace 0.0 on the number line with infinity. Thus on 2012.12.21 at 11:11 UT we can usher in a new epoch...  one without nothing.
Best wishes,
David Noel Lynch

-- Pankaj S. Joshi Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba
Mumbai 400005, India
Phone: 022-2278 2486 (direct)      022-2280 4923 (R)
Fax:  091-22-2280 4610/4611