Please pardon my interruption into
your busy day.
In your research highlights
regarding the acceleration of the universe you state, "Much to
the surprise of the search team, the distances to the supernovae
have been greater than those predicted by the Big
Bang." Enter "dark energy"
In your research highlights
regarding MACHOs you state, "These "microlensing" events reveal
otherwise invisible MACHOs, thought to be part of the 90% of a
galaxy's mass that does not shine, but exerts a gravitational
force on the stars of the galaxy, making it rotate faster than
can be accounted for by the glowing matter: "
Enter "dark matter"
When the symmetry of the 3K back
ground radiation could not be explained, the theory of inflation
was introduced. When the red shift of supernocae did not match
the Big Bang prediction, the theory of dark energy was
introduced. When the microlensing of star light was found to be
greater then the mass of the refraction object, the theory of
dark matter was introduced.
All this leave me with one
question. Why does the star light of a distant star follow the
curve of gravitationally warped time space around a nearby star?
A Big Banger might answer. The star
light's path is altered by the pull of gravity.
The baggage of the Big Bang has
grown quite large, and will continue to grow. Because
Scientists no longer look for reasons outside the construct of
the Big Bang, Science has forgotten its mission
statement. Science has become blind. Thinking only inside
the Big Bang Box.
Ponder for a moment that an
alternate theory is put forth regarding the reason that
star light is seemingly bent by massive objects. That
this theory could explain the various observed red
shifting of distant star light. That this theory is expressed on
the name of God... I A M
the imposable: "To crack the shell of Science, one
must crush the mustard seed of Religion." 3K
In the spirit of Hagel, using the
energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the logic of
Socrates, I have created an equation for a moment of time. I
call this equation the KnoWell. Below is a link to a
video of me drawing a KnoWell.
Below is a letter that I received
in response to my position on naked singularities. Below the
response is my original letter that states my position
that gravity is the result of the collapse of outer space.
Gravity is a push, not a pull. Using this model the star
light that is bent around massive objects is due to the wave
energy that is collapsing from outer space towards inner
space. That this wave energy is also stretching light causing
the red shift of star light.
The KnoWell strongly suggests
that we are living in a Hoyle's steady state
universe. The missing mass of the micro-lensing effect
can be explained by looking at a fog that is about to
condensate into rain drops. The distant wave energy of outer
space is chaotic with little structure. As the wave energy is
pressed in towards massive objects, the chaos begins to gain
symmetry then presses star light towards the massive
object. This collapse seemingly bends the light by
pushing the passing waves in towards the massive object.
To understand the
KnoWell position, one must think in reverse. A black hole
is not needed to hold the universe together. A black hole is
more like a seed from which everything is rushing outward. "A
leak." Dark energy is the release of inner space trying to
reach outer space. Please see my explanation below...
The attached file, Gold.jpg, is
how I worked out my equation. You should show Gold.jpg and the
KnoWell to the pope.
David Noel Lynch
Forwarded Message ----
<psj at tifr.res.in>
Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
Scientific American <editors at sciam.com>; Fred
Partus <fpartus at yahoo.com>; Neil deGrasse Tyson
<tyson at astro.amnh.org>
Wednesday, March 4, 2009 10:42:49 PM
A Naked Singularity
Dear Dr David Lynch,
Thank you for your mail and the interest.
The gravitational collapse is an intriguing phenomena,
viewed from the perspective of the gravitation theory. While
in Newtonian gravity,
it is the density or mass that plays the major role in
determining the gravitational
interaction, in Einstein gravity the spacetime curvatures play
a major role. The
event horizons may or may not form necessarily as the mass
during the progress of collapse. Many intriguing features than
result as we discuss
in the article.
The connections and implications for the
possible quantum gravity formulations
are most puzzling and exciting. That is a road very much under
travel, and thank you
for your interesting comments and the possibilities you
indicated. The connections
to condensed matter systems and statistical physics are
certainly not ruled out.
With best regards,
Pankaj S. Joshi
David Lynch wrote:
Please pardon my interruption into your busy day.
Your article in Scientific
American regarding naked singularities opens many
doors to a new way to look at the concept of a black
In making one of your points, you
mention that Einstein's equations for gravity suggests
that there is a component that produces a reverse force
to the direction of gravity. You
called that effect a sheering.
Using Newton's third law. Postulate for
a moment that the sheering is the action, and that gravity is
the reaction. The sheering action could be caused by
quantum loops of gravity that are extruding outward from
space, and the reaction could be due to super strings
of symmetry that are collapsing inward from outer space. Thus
particles are in a state of expansion / emission while waves
are in a state of contraction / absorption.
Under this concept, outer space would
appear to be cooling while inner space would appear to be
warming. In this mind set, we are in a Hoyle's steady
state universe. With gravity as a push due to
the collapse of outer space, the light coming from distant
stars would be stretched over distance. Thus causing
the appearance of the red shifting of star light.
shift would be an indicator of distance not the speed
This perplexing concept could
explain why most all stars seems to be moving away from us as
if a big bang occurred., and would explain the
symmetry in the distribution of the background
radiation. Think in terms of Lorentz's
ether filling outer space, and there is no need for inflation
to explain away the observed symmetrical anomaly in
the background radiation.
To better express my position, I have
created an equation. In the spirit of Hagel, using the energy
of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the logic of Socrates,
below is a link to a video of me drawing what I call a
KnoWell. The KnoWell defines a moment of time as
the infinite one.
The KnoWell equation opens the door for
time travel to use quantum tunnels opened by oscillating super
strings of symmetry upon quantum loops of gravity.. No longer
does one need infinite amounts of energy to transgress time.
Mathematics is a beautiful language
with one glaring mistake. "0.0" Think about it, one
"1" trying to define nothing is truly NSane. Since
we all live in a constant change of state, I vote that
science gives zero, 0.0, the boot. Remove zero from all
equations. The icing on the KnoWell cake would
be to replace 0.0 on the number line with infinity. Thus
on 2012.12.21 at 11:11
UT we can usher in a new epoch... one without
David Noel Lynch
-- Pankaj S. Joshi Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba
Mumbai 400005, India
Phone: 022-2278 2486 (direct) 022-2280
Fax: 091-22-2280 4610/4611